Faced with high quotes from contractors, a Chatham man living on the Thames River took decided to build an erosion-control wall along the shoreline of his property.
Tony Hill worked with two others to build the 44-foot-long and two-foot-high gabion wall, essentially a caged structure that’s filled with rocks.
Hill said the erosion had started to cut into the riverbank on his property. He first called the Lower Thames Valley Conservation Authority last fall, which directed him to file a permit for any work done and gave names of construction companies, he said.
After consulting with three companies, Hill said he was given quotes in the $40,000 to $55,000 range. His property also doesn’t have access for heavy vehicles, so some of the quotes involved taking down a hedge, which would have affected his neighbour.
“I set about to learn something about erosion control. I’ve always been keen on it,” Hill, who grew up on the Credit River in Ontario, said.
By working on the wall himself, Hill said he spent about $8,000. He plans to complete the remaining 36 feet of shoreline at an estimated cost of $4,000 to $5,000.
Hill acknowledged his engineer friends told him to find someone else to do the project for him.
“But there was nobody who was capable,” he said. “Once I had a proper plan, there was still nobody that was actually interested in the job at all.”
He said the issues with the project for the contractors was getting the materials past the driveway and the shortage of construction workers.
Hill found the gabion structures from a company in Kitchener. He purchased two of the cages that were one-foot high each and started the job in April.
“The water level was just above where I needed to put the gabions – inches – and it was really rough rock,” he said. “We managed to clear out the debris and then put a flat bed of stone … and then we put down two rows of gabions.”
Hill and his two workers wheelbarrowed the rocks from a pile in his driveway to the backyard.
There, they put the rocks in blue recycle bins and used a 32-foot slide to move the bins down the slope to the river. Hill said he used the same slide to launch his kayak into the Thames.
“I paddle up and down the river ,and the number of properties that are as bad as mine – some worse, some not as bad – right through the town is a lot,” he said.
Hill completed the first phase of the job in early November.
Jason Wintermute, manager of watershed and information services for the Lower Thames Valley Conservation Authority, said he has no preference between contractors or individuals taking on these projects as long as they’re done properly.
If others want to start this type of job, they should know permits are needed from the authority’s office, he said. Since there are species at risk in the Thames River near Chatham, both contractors and individuals should also check with Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the Ontario Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks, Wintermute added.
“That’s always a good thing to check on because there are definitely known species at risk through the Thames River in this lower portion,” Wintermute said.
Wintermute said an engineer can also help determine the best type of structure to use to deal with the erosion on a specific property.
“If there is significant erosion, we generally don’t encourage walls because what a wall tends to do is create downcutting of the river bed, or the lake bed if you’re talking at the bed of the lake, right at the toe of the wall,” he said.
“That tends to deepen that area, leading to challenges with the wall.”
People often prefer walls, Wintermute said, because of how they look. When there is significant erosion, he said the preferable alternate is usually the revetment style, which has a sloped structure.
Wintermute noted the Municipality of Chatham-Kent used the revetment style west of Chatham on a section of Riverview Line.
“There are challenges with walls. If you don’t have significant erosion, then it might be OK, but if you’ve got a significant erosion problem, it’s probably best to speak to an engineer,” he said.
Using natural materials such as plants is another option to consider, Wintermute said.
There are other areas of the Thames River in Chatham where there is significant erosion, he said, but some areas haven’t seen much erosion for decades.
Hill said he hopes others living on the Thames will consider whether their properties need erosion control measures.
“Jennifer (Hill’s wife) and I are both really interested in nature and what is going on, on the river,” he said. “It’s better for the river to not have mud sliding into it every spring.”
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.
365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4
© 2023 Chatham Daily News, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.
This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.